Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Inmunopeptidomics, quantms and non-enzymatic searches #197

Open
ypriverol opened this issue Jun 16, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Inmunopeptidomics, quantms and non-enzymatic searches #197

ypriverol opened this issue Jun 16, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed low-priority question Further information is requested

Comments

@ypriverol
Copy link
Member

Description of feature

Inmunopeptidomics is one of the use cases that quantms can try to handle in the same way that we are planning to handle Proteogenomics. For Inmunopeptidomics we will need to have the possibility to have not enzymatic digestion for all the steps.
@ypriverol ypriverol added enhancement New feature or request documentation Improvements or additions to documentation help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested low-priority labels Jun 16, 2022
@ypriverol
Copy link
Member Author

This feature is link to the following issue in sdrf-pipelines bigbio/sdrf-pipelines#147

@ypriverol ypriverol changed the title Inmunopeptidomics and quantms Inmunopeptidomics, quantms and non-enzymatic searches Aug 31, 2023
@jpfeuffer
Copy link
Collaborator

this should be supported already in LFQ and TMT mode

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed low-priority question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ypriverol @jpfeuffer