Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Doesn't require * on search #971

Open
TiagoCavalcante opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Doesn't require * on search #971

TiagoCavalcante opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@TiagoCavalcante
Copy link
Collaborator

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I believe that the current way that searching works (that is, a result is only shown if there is an exact match, or if there is an * at the end of the search) could be improved just by not requiring a * at the end of the search pattern to show inexact matches.

This is the way Mathics works.

Describe alternatives you've considered

I believe that in the future it would be a good addition to have a similarity (or even more ideally, vector) search, as well as showing a part of the description of the results in the searches and adding an "other results" section with functions whose description contains the search.

image

@axkr
Copy link
Owner

axkr commented Apr 23, 2024

Can you please test the commit and give feedback?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants