Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stronger evidence of WGD in one species versus another #80

Open
andreaswallberg opened this issue Nov 9, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Stronger evidence of WGD in one species versus another #80

andreaswallberg opened this issue Nov 9, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@andreaswallberg
Copy link

Dear developers,

We are applying your tool across nine species to test if there is stronger evidence of ancestral WGD in one species vs. the others. The tool is working very well for us (with the exception of "pairwise" mode generating empty plots after ksd, maybe because of a missing "Node" column in the output file?).

I wonder what signature I should preferably look at to distinguish between the evidence of WGD between species. What overall statistic captures the fit best such that it can be compared across species?

For example, is it reasonable to contrast a 1-component vs. 2-component model to check the overall fit and test what proportion of gene families become associated with the second component in each species?

Any pointers are valuable here.

Thanks for a great tool!

Cheers!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant