Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Frequency Lists Don't Work in 2.9.0 Preview 2, work fine in 2.8.9 #387

Open
JJMANJJ opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Frequency Lists Don't Work in 2.9.0 Preview 2, work fine in 2.8.9 #387

JJMANJJ opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@JJMANJJ
Copy link

JJMANJJ commented Jun 3, 2024

Yomichan format frequency lists don't seem to work in 2.9.0 Preview 2. They install but don't show up. However, after uninstalling this app and reinstalling 2.8.9, I am able to successfully see the frequency lists just fine. I tested this behavior on multiple devices and with multiple different frequency lists with the same results.

@avc1657
Copy link

avc1657 commented Jun 5, 2024

Yeah, I reported the same thing 2 months ago. Only a few frequency lists seem to be consistently working in 2.9.0 and that's one of the reasons I downgraded to 2.8.9.

@JJMANJJ
Copy link
Author

JJMANJJ commented Jun 5, 2024

Yeah, I reported the same thing 2 months ago. Only a few frequency lists seem to be consistently working in 2.9.0 and that's one of the reasons I downgraded to 2.8.9.

I saw your post but I wasn't sure if it was the same issue since I couldn't get any of my 5 frequency lists to work. The release page says that 2.9.0 added Yomichan Strctured Content support. I imaging that thats what broke the frequency list support. I found that the frequency lists work if you import them in 2.8.9 and then upgrade to 2.9.0, you just can't import them directly to 2.9.0.

@avc1657
Copy link

avc1657 commented Jun 6, 2024

Yeah 2.9.0 broke a lot of things as far as i can see. I got some JMDict formatting problems when exporting cards, half my frequency lists stopped working, recursive lookups is not broken, but way more difficult to execute, etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants