Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow to search for caches by name #39

Open
Dasmark opened this issue Apr 12, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

Allow to search for caches by name #39

Dasmark opened this issue Apr 12, 2013 · 0 comments

Comments

@Dasmark
Copy link

Dasmark commented Apr 12, 2013

Many caches are part of a series, for example "In 80 days around the world", which are 80 Caches which all have a common name, only a special suffix like "day 4" and so on. Not only for these, but generally it would be nice to have the possibility to search for caches by name. I know I can do the same with pocket queries, but I find the Locus-interface far superior to the geocaching.com website. Just yesterday I found a cache on the livemap, forgot to import it for offline use and then at the village where the cache was, the live-map stopped working (probably because I was on Edge newtwork only). I remembered the name of the cache, but couldn't download it :o(

Ideally, you'd only get a list of matching names and can then select the caches that you want, but if that's too hard to do, simply importing all that match into a folder like the current "search"-function (which is only location-based) does, would be nice, too.

@arcao arcao modified the milestones: Version 1.5.5, 1.5.3 Jul 11, 2014
@arcao arcao self-assigned this Jul 11, 2014
@arcao arcao modified the milestone: Version 1.5.5 Nov 2, 2014
@arcao arcao added this to the Version 2.2 milestone Sep 4, 2015
@arcao arcao modified the milestones: Version 2.2, Version 2.3 Jul 31, 2017
@arcao arcao modified the milestones: Version 2.3, Version 3.1 May 17, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants