We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
depends on #14
Possible solutions:
repository_dispatch
issue_comment
[1] https://help.github.com/en/actions/reference/events-that-trigger-workflows#external-events-repository_dispatch [2] https://help.github.com/en/actions/reference/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue-comment-event-issue_comment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
repository_dispatch will need Personal Access Token to trigger update workflow, and I guess that doesn't fit for the case if the consumer code is hosted on public repo. https://help.github.com/en/actions/configuring-and-managing-workflows/creating-and-storing-encrypted-secrets secret needs to be stored encrypted.
Sorry, something went wrong.
I'm not sure how much beneficial to construct this, given:
So, there won't be so much difference in the latency, compared to updating every 30 minutes.
the only benefit here is that we can avoid unnecessary workflow running.
No branches or pull requests
depends on #14
Possible solutions:
repository_dispatch
[1] , and directly trigger update from ecma262 repoissue_comment
[2] , and post issue comment from ecma262 repo[1] https://help.github.com/en/actions/reference/events-that-trigger-workflows#external-events-repository_dispatch
[2] https://help.github.com/en/actions/reference/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue-comment-event-issue_comment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: