-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[pipelineX](dependency) split different dependencies #27366
Conversation
cc65e79
to
6b1d7fa
Compare
run buildall |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
clang-tidy made some suggestions
@@ -79,37 +83,46 @@ Status AggLocalState::init(RuntimeState* state, LocalStateInfo& info) { | |||
return Status::OK(); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
Status AggLocalState::_destroy_agg_status(vectorized::AggregateDataPtr data) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
warning: method '_destroy_agg_status' can be made static [readability-convert-member-functions-to-static]
be/src/pipeline/exec/aggregation_source_operator.h:110:
- Status _destroy_agg_status(vectorized::AggregateDataPtr data);
+ static Status _destroy_agg_status(vectorized::AggregateDataPtr data);
for (size_t i = 0; i < _shared_state->aggregate_evaluators.size(); ++i) | ||
_shared_state->aggregate_evaluators[i]->insert_result_info( | ||
mapped + _dependency->offsets_of_aggregate_states()[i], | ||
for (size_t i = 0; i < shared_state.aggregate_evaluators.size(); ++i) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
warning: statement should be inside braces [readability-braces-around-statements]
for (size_t i = 0; i < shared_state.aggregate_evaluators.size(); ++i) | |
for (size_t i = 0; i < shared_state.aggregate_evaluators.size(); ++i) { |
be/src/pipeline/exec/aggregation_source_operator.cpp:443:
- value_columns[i].get());
+ value_columns[i].get());
+ }
@@ -175,6 +175,68 @@ void HashJoinBuildSinkLocalState::init_short_circuit_for_probe() { | |||
p._join_op == TJoinOp::LEFT_ANTI_JOIN); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
Status HashJoinBuildSinkLocalState::_do_evaluate(vectorized::Block& block, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
warning: method '_do_evaluate' can be made static [readability-convert-member-functions-to-static]
Status HashJoinBuildSinkLocalState::_do_evaluate(vectorized::Block& block, | |
static Status HashJoinBuildSinkLocalState::_do_evaluate(vectorized::Block& block, |
return results; | ||
} | ||
|
||
Status HashJoinBuildSinkLocalState::_extract_join_column( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
warning: method '_extract_join_column' can be made static [readability-convert-member-functions-to-static]
Status HashJoinBuildSinkLocalState::_extract_join_column( | |
static Status HashJoinBuildSinkLocalState::_extract_join_column( |
@@ -402,6 +402,48 @@ Status HashJoinProbeOperatorX::pull(doris::RuntimeState* state, vectorized::Bloc | |||
return Status::OK(); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
Status HashJoinProbeLocalState::_extract_join_column(vectorized::Block& block, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
warning: method '_extract_join_column' can be made static [readability-convert-member-functions-to-static]
Status HashJoinProbeLocalState::_extract_join_column(vectorized::Block& block, | |
static Status HashJoinProbeLocalState::_extract_join_column(vectorized::Block& block, |
@@ -93,6 +93,16 @@ class StreamingAggSinkLocalState final | |||
Status _pre_agg_with_serialized_key(doris::vectorized::Block* in_block, | |||
doris::vectorized::Block* out_block); | |||
bool _should_expand_preagg_hash_tables(); | |||
void _make_nullable_output_key(vectorized::Block* block) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
warning: method '_make_nullable_output_key' can be made static [readability-convert-member-functions-to-static]
void _make_nullable_output_key(vectorized::Block* block) { | |
static void _make_nullable_output_key(vectorized::Block* block) { |
TPC-H test result on machine: 'aliyun_ecs.c7a.8xlarge_32C64G'
|
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
run buildall |
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
TPC-H test result on machine: 'aliyun_ecs.c7a.8xlarge_32C64G'
|
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
run buildall |
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
run buildall |
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
TPC-H test result on machine: 'aliyun_ecs.c7a.8xlarge_32C64G'
|
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
run buildall |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
run buildall |
run buildall |
1 similar comment
run buildall |
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
TPC-H test result on machine: 'aliyun_ecs.c7a.8xlarge_32C64G'
|
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
Proposed changes
Issue Number: close #xxx
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at [email protected] by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...