You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What feature or improvement would you like to see?
ADBC parameter binding works by binding an array and schema. This allows for the possibility of named bindings in the query and not just positional bindings. The Snowflake driver ignores the names in the schema and just binds the individual columns by ordinal. It's not possible without parsing the command text to know whether it uses positional binding markers (?) or named binding markers (:name), so enabling support for binding by name will probably require opting-in with a statement option e.g. adbc.snowflake.statement.bind_parameters_by_name.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What feature or improvement would you like to see?
ADBC parameter binding works by binding an array and schema. This allows for the possibility of named bindings in the query and not just positional bindings. The Snowflake driver ignores the names in the schema and just binds the individual columns by ordinal. It's not possible without parsing the command text to know whether it uses positional binding markers (
?
) or named binding markers (:name
), so enabling support for binding by name will probably require opting-in with a statement option e.g.adbc.snowflake.statement.bind_parameters_by_name
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: