Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistent ordering of values along OBSERVATION dimension #163

Open
mhidas opened this issue Jun 7, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Inconsistent ordering of values along OBSERVATION dimension #163

mhidas opened this issue Jun 7, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
velocity_aggregated Issues relating to the velocity aggregated time series product velocity_hourly Issues relating to the velocity hourly time series product
Milestone

Comments

@mhidas
Copy link
Contributor

mhidas commented Jun 7, 2022

In the velocity aggregated product, we cycled through all the vertical cells at a given timestamp before moving on to the next timestamp. In the velocity hourly, we add each "slice" of timeseries (currently up to 90 days long) at one cell, then the cycle through the cells.

Given that we're building a properly indexed ragged array, the output timeseries can be reconstructed the same way in each case (via the instrument_index and CELL_INDEX variables), but it might be helpful to be consistent.

This was pointed out in #99 (comment), and I don't think we ever addressed it.

@mhidas mhidas added velocity_aggregated Issues relating to the velocity aggregated time series product velocity_hourly Issues relating to the velocity hourly time series product labels Jun 7, 2022
@mhidas mhidas added this to the v2.0 milestone Jun 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
velocity_aggregated Issues relating to the velocity aggregated time series product velocity_hourly Issues relating to the velocity hourly time series product
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant