Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider treating "page experience" as a proper noun. #169

Open
samouri opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Consider treating "page experience" as a proper noun. #169

samouri opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@samouri
Copy link
Member

samouri commented Jan 19, 2022

Summary

Throughout the bentojs website, the term "page experience" comes up multiple times. While this may be a common term for those familiar with the Google Search ranking signal, it may be worth it for us to treat it as a proper noun (capitalize) and to provide a canonical link. That way it doesn't seem like a "fluff" term and is seen as a highly specific value proposition.

Relatedly, in the section titled "Great page experience with Bento", I think it would be more clear to state "Great Web Vitals" instead since the corresponding image directly references vitals specifically.

Screen Shot 2022-01-19 at 9 42 12 AM

@samouri
Copy link
Member Author

samouri commented Jan 20, 2022

/to @kristoferbaxter for proper noun evaluation, and @sebastianbenz for input on the specific called out section

@sebastianbenz
Copy link
Collaborator

sebastianbenz commented Jan 20, 2022

Good point (and I agree with you), but we've discussed this before and decided to follow the style of the official documentation on developers.google.com.

@samouri
Copy link
Member Author

samouri commented Jan 20, 2022

developers.google.com

  • At the minimum, the text "page experience" should be a hyperlink to that article.
  • The section called out in particular can more specifically say "Great Core Vitals" with a hyperlink instead of the fuzzy page experience.

Now to the bikeshed piece. For something this misleading, I would still vote to treat as a proper noun even if inconsistent with Google's documentation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants