You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The issue is that syntax highlighting is either non existent or partially existent for many languages. This is not urgent in any way, it's more of a quality of life thing and an accessibility issue. It could be considered a accessibility issue because syntax highlighting makes it easier for individuals such as my self to read code, helping those that are Neurodivergent, or that have other similar issue. Also it is important to note that several languages already have full syntax highlighting and the fact that there is this difference can lead to an inconsistency between implementations because you can go from a language that has full to non when switching between languages in a single algorithm. The following are the languages that have no syntax highlighting:
coconut
LOLCODE?
Piet (the written part)
Whitespace
possibly emojicode
GNUPLOT
Steps to Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Go to Iterated Function Systems (for example but any chapter with code will work if it has the language in question)
Click on the language change drop down
Change language to one of the above mentioned ones
Scroll down until a code block comes up
You will see that it is not syntax highlighted
Expected behavior
Again I would not classify this so much as expected behaviors but more as something nice to see. It would be nice for various reasons (only some of which were mentioned above) to have all languages be syntax highlighted in code blocks. I would be willing to elaborate more on my personal reasons for preferring syntax highlighting below in a response .
Screenshots
I have put together some side by side images of syntax highlighting on AAA vs. in vs code (vs code since that is my personal preferred text editor and thus is what I have on hand to compare to, I'm sure you could find something similar in atom, sublime, vim or any other text editor, that is just my personal choice). As a note I installed some plugins for certain lang's such as the official Julia plugin for Julia. Also I could not find a single implementation that had all of the implementations I wanted to show so I used different algorithms for some.
GNUPLOT (domain coloring)
vs code
AAA
Coconut (Barnsley fern)
vs code
AAA
Environment
OS: Windows
OS Version: 10.0.19043
Browser: Firefox (this should be the same across all browsers though and it would be an actual big problem if it was not)
Browser Version: 95.0.2
Additional context
There are also several languages that technically have syntax highlighting but to a significantly lesser degree then would be nice to have. Some languages have certain key words or numbers highlighted but not others. Below I have compiled a list of some of the languages that could benefit from better syntax highlighting, though it is not all that extensive just a quick example list:
Julia
Common Lisp
C++
smalltalk
In general I feel that the syntax highlighting could be better across across the board.
For Algorithm Archive Developers
The bug can be reproduced
The bug can be fixed
There is a timeline to fix the bug
The bug has been fixed (Please link the PR)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Bug Report
Description
The issue is that syntax highlighting is either non existent or partially existent for many languages. This is not urgent in any way, it's more of a quality of life thing and an accessibility issue. It could be considered a accessibility issue because syntax highlighting makes it easier for individuals such as my self to read code, helping those that are Neurodivergent, or that have other similar issue. Also it is important to note that several languages already have full syntax highlighting and the fact that there is this difference can lead to an inconsistency between implementations because you can go from a language that has full to non when switching between languages in a single algorithm. The following are the languages that have no syntax highlighting:
Steps to Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
Again I would not classify this so much as expected behaviors but more as something nice to see. It would be nice for various reasons (only some of which were mentioned above) to have all languages be syntax highlighted in code blocks. I would be willing to elaborate more on my personal reasons for preferring syntax highlighting below in a response .
Screenshots
I have put together some side by side images of syntax highlighting on AAA vs. in vs code (vs code since that is my personal preferred text editor and thus is what I have on hand to compare to, I'm sure you could find something similar in atom, sublime, vim or any other text editor, that is just my personal choice). As a note I installed some plugins for certain lang's such as the official Julia plugin for Julia. Also I could not find a single implementation that had all of the implementations I wanted to show so I used different algorithms for some.
Environment
Additional context
There are also several languages that technically have syntax highlighting but to a significantly lesser degree then would be nice to have. Some languages have certain key words or numbers highlighted but not others. Below I have compiled a list of some of the languages that could benefit from better syntax highlighting, though it is not all that extensive just a quick example list:
In general I feel that the syntax highlighting could be better across across the board.
For Algorithm Archive Developers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: