Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Results are bad/random #18

Open
KoenL-1747481 opened this issue Feb 19, 2022 · 7 comments
Open

Results are bad/random #18

KoenL-1747481 opened this issue Feb 19, 2022 · 7 comments

Comments

@KoenL-1747481
Copy link

KoenL-1747481 commented Feb 19, 2022

I have tried the demo file of your fork of the matterport mask rcnn repo and the resulting segmentations are very random :
image
I experience the same issue with this tutorial. I also tried "augmented startups'" fork of the matterport mask rcnn repo (https://github.com/augmentedstartups/Mask_RCNN#readme) but running that demo also gives very random segmentations. It seems like the COCO pre-trained weights are just not working or something. Any idea how to fix this? Results from this tutorial look like this:
image

I tried this on 2 pc's with installations from scratch and both have the same random results.

@KoenL-1747481 KoenL-1747481 changed the title Results are random Results are bad/random Feb 19, 2022
@akTwelve
Copy link
Owner

It’s probably just drawing them wrong. Sometimes X and Y or Width and Height get swapped and the segmentations don’t get drawn correctly. I haven’t used this repo in a long time so I’m not exactly sure what’s up though.

@m11005217
Copy link

I have tried the demo file of your fork of the matterport mask rcnn repo and the resulting segmentations are very random : image I experience the same issue with this tutorial. I also tried "augmented startups'" fork of the matterport mask rcnn repo (https://github.com/augmentedstartups/Mask_RCNN#readme) but running that demo also gives very random segmentations. It seems like the COCO pre-trained weights are just not working or something. Any idea how to fix this? Results from this tutorial look like this: image

I tried this on 2 pc's with installations from scratch and both have the same random results.

Did you solve this problem, I also have same problem.

@KoenL-1747481
Copy link
Author

KoenL-1747481 commented Mar 29, 2022

I have tried the demo file of your fork of the matterport mask rcnn repo and the resulting segmentations are very random : image I experience the same issue with this tutorial. I also tried "augmented startups'" fork of the matterport mask rcnn repo (https://github.com/augmentedstartups/Mask_RCNN#readme) but running that demo also gives very random segmentations. It seems like the COCO pre-trained weights are just not working or something. Any idea how to fix this? Results from this tutorial look like this: image
I tried this on 2 pc's with installations from scratch and both have the same random results.

Did you solve this problem, I also have same problem.

Yes and no.. i didn't fix it in this repo, but i stumbled upon facebook's mask rcnn implementation called detectron2 (search for the github repo). Its still actively being updated and it works perfectly with just a few lines of code (https://youtu.be/Pb3opEFP94U)

@m11005217
Copy link

Grateful ! Thanks for your help.
I will do my best

@ansacaron
Copy link

Exactly the same problem here... any clue?

@KoenL-1747481
Copy link
Author

Exactly the same problem here... any clue?

I moved on with facebook's mask rcnn implementation as i mentioned in a previous comment. Otherwise i have no clue

@pooyasohrabipoor
Copy link

pooyasohrabipoor commented Apr 2, 2023

It’s probably just drawing them wrong. Sometimes X and Y or Width and Height get swapped and the segmentations don’t get drawn correctly. I haven’t used this repo in a long time so I’m not exactly sure what’s up though.

Hi
I am trying to use your code and your dataset but not only dont I get a good inference result, but also the validation loss is way higher than your results ( around 2 after 8 epochs) and when I use the inference my results are so random and bad. I do not want to use some tools like mmdetection because later on I need to modify maskrcnn code for my dataset. Do you have any idea or suggestions?
I really appreciate your assistance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants