You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
move the "unique" field to the bottom. It is the most sophisticated property, and must logically be
the last one (this should more generally be taken as a rule for all limits and colimits).
I suggest to replace 'unique' with what is currently derived as 'unique-diagram'. This would make
everything symmetric, and I would expect, in most cases, it would be easier to prove that something is a
pullback.
As a bonus, uniqueness will no longer depend on 'eq : f ∘ h₁ ≈ g ∘ h₂', which is really not needed for
it, but which gets in way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(from @sergey-goncharov ):
I would suggest:
move the "unique" field to the bottom. It is the most sophisticated property, and must logically be
the last one (this should more generally be taken as a rule for all limits and colimits).
I suggest to replace 'unique' with what is currently derived as 'unique-diagram'. This would make
everything symmetric, and I would expect, in most cases, it would be easier to prove that something is a
pullback.
As a bonus, uniqueness will no longer depend on 'eq : f ∘ h₁ ≈ g ∘ h₂', which is really not needed for
it, but which gets in way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: