Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[otfautohint] (minor) outdated tool names #1723

Open
frankrolf opened this issue Oct 29, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[otfautohint] (minor) outdated tool names #1723

frankrolf opened this issue Oct 29, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
aesthetics ux issue, not a functional problem

Comments

@frankrolf
Copy link
Member

When running otfautohint on an edited UFO without running checkoutlinesufo first, the output may be

ERROR: Glyph 'flex.01' has been edited. You must first run 'checkOutlines' before running 'autohint'. Skipping.
ERROR: Glyph 'flex.02' has been edited. You must first run 'checkOutlines' before running 'autohint'. Skipping.
ERROR: Glyph 'flex.03' has been edited. You must first run 'checkOutlines' before running 'autohint'. Skipping.
ERROR: Glyph 'flex.04' has been edited. You must first run 'checkOutlines' before running 'autohint'. Skipping.

This seems to be an outdated error message. I’d expect the tool names to reflect the real-world tool names:
checkOutlines → checkoutlinesufo
autohint → otfautohint
@frankrolf frankrolf added the aesthetics ux issue, not a functional problem label Jan 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
aesthetics ux issue, not a functional problem
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@frankrolf