-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support https://adhearsion.com/ #39
Comments
The ageing gems are also a concern. However, most of the dynamic elements seem redundant now. Would it make more sense to turn it into a static site? Probably cheaper too. |
Good point, that would reduce surface area of risk. |
If you used middleman, you could render the existing templates at compile-time, and just host from S3 or similar. |
@benlangfeld, exactly what I was thinking as I've used Middleman before. Would GitHub Pages even be an option? |
Yes, looks like it. If someone can get middleman working, just let me know if there’s anything you need me to do with configuration/DNS/etc |
Awesome. If we end up doing middleman -> github pages, I think I found the necessary deets for SSL of custom github-io domains here: GitHub Blog: Custom domains on GitHub Pages gain support for HTTPS Basically may just require a CNAME 💪 |
Sorry, please ignore my CNAME suggestion. @adhearsion.com has active MX records, and using a CNAME will break mail functionality for the domain. as suggested here on S.O., a good approach is to use A, ALIAS or ANAME - but not a CNAME. |
I think we need to cover the following bases:
Having a site on http:// has a negative impact on security and visitor confidence:
Additionally, it has a negative impact on SEO for those who are searching for a great platform for controlling communications.
There are a few good, free options for free SSL these days, including Let's Encrypt and CloudFlare's Universal SSL.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: