You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It can be more useful in some cases to solve the LP in Frank-Wolfe not the MIP (see Network Design Problem).
We currently rely a lot on the fact that the vertices are integer feasible. So this will probably require quite a bit work.
Ideally, we simply create a new Node type and implement the branching and evaluation functions for this (i.e. we will have a new file, e.g. called node_lp.jl).
Check where we implicitly or explicitly rely on the integrality of vertices.
Does the solve function rely on that? If yes, how do we best avoid copy-pasting and having duplicate code?
Does the strong convexity and global/dual tightening work out of the box?
Adapt strong branching.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It can be more useful in some cases to solve the LP in Frank-Wolfe not the MIP (see Network Design Problem).
We currently rely a lot on the fact that the vertices are integer feasible. So this will probably require quite a bit work.
Ideally, we simply create a new Node type and implement the branching and evaluation functions for this (i.e. we will have a new file, e.g. called
node_lp.jl
).solve
function rely on that? If yes, how do we best avoid copy-pasting and having duplicate code?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: