Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistency in cut definition #192

Open
cwittweg opened this issue Aug 20, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Inconsistency in cut definition #192

cwittweg opened this issue Aug 20, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@cwittweg
Copy link

df.loc[:, self.name()] = np.where(df_test['CES'] < 250, df['CutS2Width'], df_test[self.name()])

Checking with Chiara and Alexander we found that there is a small inconsistency in the cut definition. The cut lines for the S2Width_HE have been defined up to 200 keV and thereafter. However, the low and high energy parts of the cut are stitched together at 250 keV. This leads to an apparent acceptance drop between 200 and 250 keV where it is not clear if the cut removes target events or if it has an actual acceptance drop. I would suggest to just change the number from 250 to 200.

cuts2width_he_rn16000-18836_n-1_acceptance

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant