Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What Can GitHub Tell Us About the HDL Industry? (Part 3) #11

Open
umarcor opened this issue Sep 2, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

What Can GitHub Tell Us About the HDL Industry? (Part 3) #11

umarcor opened this issue Sep 2, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@umarcor
Copy link
Member

umarcor commented Sep 2, 2020

ref: https://larsasplund.github.io/github-facts/verification-practices.html#users
repo: LarsAsplund/github-facts
related: [2, 3, 6, 14, 32]
tags:
- cocotb
- osvvm
- study
- uvm
- uvvm
- verification
- vunit

The third part was published:

In the second article about our GitHub study we analyzed the popularity of standard verification frameworks in VHDL repositories. This time we extend on those findings by analyzing the Git history of those repositories to find the number of users and examine how that changed over time.

Number of standard VHDL verification frameworks on GitHub over time

Looking at users rather than repositories doesn’t have a drastic effect to the overall picture. VUnit is still the most commonly used verification framework on GitHub. However, when separating professional and academic users we're starting to see interesting differences and anomalies in the data.

The full story and the code used to derive these facts are part of an open science project. Everything can be reviewed and the results can be repeated. We encourage contributions and suggestions on other interesting facts that we should derive.

-- Lars Asplund linkedin.com/pulse/what-can-github-tell-us-hdl-industry-part-3-lars-asplund/

@umarcor umarcor added the cat: News News label Sep 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant