You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
You already mention the licensing in the README, however, having a LICENSE or COPYING file in the repository would make it easier to spot what license is used.
Additionally, the individual code files are currently having a header which smells like "All Rights Reserved". Ideally they'd receive a file header which would restate the license (GPL header and a note that commercial licenses are available).
Last but for sure not least, there is no hint as to how contributing works. As you're offering a commercial tier, you'll require a CLA from any contributors (otherwise you wouldn't be able to sell a non-GPL commercial tier). That should be reflected in the README (or in a CONTRIBUTE file).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You already mention the licensing in the README, however, having a LICENSE or COPYING file in the repository would make it easier to spot what license is used.
Additionally, the individual code files are currently having a header which smells like "All Rights Reserved". Ideally they'd receive a file header which would restate the license (GPL header and a note that commercial licenses are available).
Last but for sure not least, there is no hint as to how contributing works. As you're offering a commercial tier, you'll require a CLA from any contributors (otherwise you wouldn't be able to sell a non-GPL commercial tier). That should be reflected in the README (or in a CONTRIBUTE file).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: