Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with LinkADRReq Persistence on TTN with LoRaWAN v1.0.4 and rp002-1.0.3 #7376

Open
4 of 6 tasks
autume opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
4 of 6 tasks
Assignees
Labels
needs/triage We still need to triage this

Comments

@autume
Copy link

autume commented Nov 5, 2024

Summary

We are facing an issue with persistent LinkADRReq messages on TTN when using a device with LoRaWAN v1.0.4 and rp002-1.0.3. The device does not support ADR.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Configure the device to operate in the 868.1 MHz region on the TTN console.
  2. Ensure the device does not support ADR.
  3. Successfully join the network.
  4. Observe the LNS initiating a LinkADRReq.
  5. Device responds with LinkADRAns (0x01: ChannelMaskACK ok).

Current Result

The LNS continuously sends LinkADRReq messages and does not stop until the device responds with LinkADRAns (0x07).

Expected Result

The LNS should not persist in sending LinkADRReq messages when the device does not support ADR, and it should not check the PowerACK and DataRateACK bits.

Relevant Logs

No response

URL

No response

Deployment

The Things Stack Cloud

The Things Stack Version

3.32.1

Client Name and Version

No response

Other Information

No response

Proposed Fix

No response

Contributing

  • I can help by doing more research.
  • I can help by implementing a fix after the proposal above is approved.
  • I can help by testing the fix before it's released.

Validation

Code of Conduct

@autume autume added the needs/triage We still need to triage this label Nov 5, 2024
@halimi halimi self-assigned this Nov 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs/triage We still need to triage this
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants