Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Azure Files implementation #833

Open
MgSam opened this issue Apr 4, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Azure Files implementation #833

MgSam opened this issue Apr 4, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
area: meta Issues around high-level/organizational topics state: needs discussion Issues that need further discussion type: enhancement Issues that propose new functionality

Comments

@MgSam
Copy link

MgSam commented Apr 4, 2022

I'm working on porting an app from running directly on a web server to Azure App Services. As part of this, I need to move the filesystem access that my app does to using Azure Files (which is part of Azure Storage). This is part of package Azure.Storage.Files.Shares for those interested.

At the same time, I want to keep the file system access generic enough to work either locally or in Azure. System.IO.Abstractions is perfect for that purpose.

My question is- does a System.IO.Abstractions wrapper for Azure Files already exist? (I didn't find one on a cursory search) And, if not, does anyone else have interest in this? I'm considering implementing and releasing as a public package if there is interest in the community.

@MgSam MgSam added state: needs discussion Issues that need further discussion type: enhancement Issues that propose new functionality labels Apr 4, 2022
@fgreinacher
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your suggestion! I am also not aware of such a package. If you want to start something we could have the repo in this organization and link it from the readme here.

@fgreinacher fgreinacher added the area: meta Issues around high-level/organizational topics label Apr 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: meta Issues around high-level/organizational topics state: needs discussion Issues that need further discussion type: enhancement Issues that propose new functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants