Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvements for V2.0 #29

Open
dgarijo opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Improvements for V2.0 #29

dgarijo opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@dgarijo
Copy link
Member

dgarijo commented Oct 9, 2024

I am adding here some of the contents of https://github.com/TEC-Toolkit/Emission-Conversion-Factors-Ontology/discussions/97 because I can never find it. A summary:

  • Source and target should include an intermediate class that has the unit, instead of having source element, source unit.
  • We have tags, but they refer to activities. For example "Butane" in reality refers to the activity "Burning Butane", which uses "Butane" as input and produces CO2 as a target. The current modeling is not wrong, it simplifies things. But this characterization seems more "correct".

When we integrate other sources, we will see whether we need to push for this change further.

@dgarijo dgarijo added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 9, 2024
@dgarijo
Copy link
Member Author

dgarijo commented Oct 9, 2024

Also please bear in mind that these changes have major impact in the mappings, calculator, etc.

@m-markovic
Copy link
Contributor

We should also consider lining mentions of different Tier methods and uncertainty values as per the IPCC guidelines https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/

  • if available, add link between CF and the corresponding IPCC tier method
  • if available, add link to uncertainty values associated with the specific CF

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants