Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement Post-Installation Verification for Web5 CLI #388

Open
14 tasks
Tracked by #322
blackgirlbytes opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #393
Open
14 tasks
Tracked by #322

Implement Post-Installation Verification for Web5 CLI #388

blackgirlbytes opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #393

Comments

@blackgirlbytes
Copy link
Contributor

Implement Post-Installation Verification for Web5 CLI

🚀 Goal

Create a post-installation verification process for the Web5 CLI to ensure it's correctly installed and configured, and all dependencies are properly set up.

🔑 Tasks

  • Design the verification process flow
  • Implement a web5 doctor command
  • Check for correct installation of the CLI itself
  • Verify all required dependencies are installed and at the correct versions
  • Check for proper environment setup (e.g., necessary environment variables)
  • Verify connectivity to necessary services (if applicable)
  • Test basic CLI functionality
  • Implement a way to run individual verification checks
  • Create helpful error messages and remediation suggestions for failed checks
  • Add an option to automatically fix minor issues if possible
  • Implement logging of the verification process
  • Write unit and integration tests for the verification process
  • Update CLI documentation to include information about the doctor command
  • Consider adding an auto-run option for verification after installation

🌟 Resources

⚡ Getting Started

  1. Comment ".take" on this issue to get assigned
  2. Fork the repository and create a new branch for this task
  3. Implement the post-installation verification functionality
  4. Write tests for your implementation
  5. Update documentation to include the new doctor command
  6. Submit a pull request with your changes
  7. Respond to any feedback during the review process

Implementation Ideas

  1. Use a struct to represent the state of various checks:
struct HealthCheckState {
    cli_version: Option<String>,
    dependencies: HashMap<String, bool>,
    env_vars: HashMap<String, bool>,
    connectivity: bool,
    basic_functionality: bool,
}
  1. Implement a function to run all checks:
fn run_health_checks() -> HealthCheckState {
    let mut state = HealthCheckState::new();
    
    state.cli_version = check_cli_version();
    state.dependencies = check_dependencies();
    state.env_vars = check_environment_variables();
    state.connectivity = check_connectivity();
    state.basic_functionality = test_basic_functionality();
    
    state
}
  1. Provide detailed output for failed checks:
fn print_health_check_results(state: &HealthCheckState) {
    println!("Web5 CLI Health Check Results:");
    println!("CLI Version: {}", state.cli_version.as_ref().unwrap_or(&"Unknown".to_string()));
    
    for (dep, status) in &state.dependencies {
        println!("Dependency {}: {}", dep, if *status { "OK" } else { "FAILED" });
    }
    
    // ... print other results ...
    
    if !state.basic_functionality {
        println!("Basic functionality test failed. Please check the logs for more information.");
    }
}

💭 Questions?

If you have any questions or need clarification, please comment on this issue or join our Discord community.

Happy coding! 🎉

@Harshil-Jani
Copy link
Contributor

.take

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Thanks for taking this issue! Let us know if you have any questions!

@Harshil-Jani Harshil-Jani linked a pull request Oct 11, 2024 that will close this issue
20 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants