Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stop Using Tailwind CSS #18

Open
https123456789 opened this issue Oct 12, 2022 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #20
Open

Stop Using Tailwind CSS #18

https123456789 opened this issue Oct 12, 2022 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #20
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@https123456789
Copy link
Member

Tailwind CSS is great, but while it gives a lot of good, predefined color and such, because it is a utility first style framework, it makes it significantly harder to keep colors consistent across the site. My proposal is to write our CSS from scratch and reference Tailwind and other frameworks for some of the generic tools. This would require quite a large overhaul of the site and @DevBro123 would most certainly be needed (once the basics of the system are in place) to help refine the CSS. I do plan on doing the majority of the overhaul myself, including all of the backend work and generating the basics of the CSS. After this is when I plan on @DevBro123 to start refining the system.

@https123456789 https123456789 added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Oct 12, 2022
@https123456789 https123456789 linked a pull request Oct 12, 2022 that will close this issue
@https123456789 https123456789 linked a pull request Oct 12, 2022 that will close this issue
@https123456789 https123456789 pinned this issue Oct 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants