We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request:
I'm not keen on the parameter names p0, p1 etc fallback.
As we now the type, would be be cool to prefix it with the names? Also I think a 1 based number is more natural.
Text:
I have 2 numbers 3 and 4 and this is my 'cool' text.
Current result: int p0, Decimal p1, int p2, string p3
int p0, Decimal p1, int p2, string p3
Proposal: int number1, Decimal number2, int number3, int text1 Or : int number, Decimal number2, int number3, int text
int number1, Decimal number2, int number3, int text1
int number, Decimal number2, int number3, int text
PS: I see this is handled in StepParameterNameGenerator.GenerateParameterName
StepParameterNameGenerator.GenerateParameterName
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Issue Description
Feature request:
I'm not keen on the parameter names p0, p1 etc fallback.
As we now the type, would be be cool to prefix it with the names? Also I think a 1 based number is more natural.
Text:
Current result:
int p0, Decimal p1, int p2, string p3
Proposal:
int number1, Decimal number2, int number3, int text1
Or :
int number, Decimal number2, int number3, int text
PS: I see this is handled in
StepParameterNameGenerator.GenerateParameterName
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: