Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Generation: better parameter names than p0, p1 etc #173

Open
304NotModified opened this issue Apr 26, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Generation: better parameter names than p0, p1 etc #173

304NotModified opened this issue Apr 26, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
Difficulty: hard Feature-Request Severity: medium

Comments

@304NotModified
Copy link
Contributor

Issue Description

Feature request:

I'm not keen on the parameter names p0, p1 etc fallback.

As we now the type, would be be cool to prefix it with the names? Also I think a 1 based number is more natural.

Text:

I have 2 numbers 3 and 4 and this is my 'cool' text.

Current result: int p0, Decimal p1, int p2, string p3

Proposal: int number1, Decimal number2, int number3, int text1
Or : int number, Decimal number2, int number3, int text

PS: I see this is handled in StepParameterNameGenerator.GenerateParameterName
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Difficulty: hard Feature-Request Severity: medium
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@SabotageAndi @304NotModified