Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CLA transparency #232

Open
QuLogic opened this issue Feb 7, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

CLA transparency #232

QuLogic opened this issue Feb 7, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@QuLogic
Copy link
Member

QuLogic commented Feb 7, 2020

Where is the source of the CLA assistant? And who's running it? The status that is posted on GitHub points to http://scitools.org.uk/governance.html#contributors, but that is an old link, and there are no contributors listed on the one it redirects to.

Where is the canonical list of contributors? Who should I ping to update it?

For example, I see in SciTools/iris#3299 that the bot thinks that bouweandela signed the CLA, but I can't find that name in contributors.json.

@ajdawson
Copy link
Member

ajdawson commented Feb 7, 2020

I had wondered the same thing. The source is here: https://github.com/SciTools-incubator/scitools-cla-checker. From a quick look it considers anyone in the contributors.json to have signed a CLA (but that method is considered outdated) and then for the new system it is somehow integrated with the Google Docs form based CLA, see https://github.com/SciTools-incubator/scitools-cla-checker/blob/master/scitools_cla_checker/update_pr.py#L188.

I assume that if it says the CLA is signed then that is acceptable as that user must have used the Newer Google Docs based CLA submission.

@QuLogic
Copy link
Member Author

QuLogic commented Feb 19, 2020

Turns out there is a page on the wiki detailing all this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants