You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The important list of "Implementations ... of Standard ML" speaks in terms of "now" from approx. 10-15 years ago, e.g. for Moscow ML "Version 2.0, now implements SML '97" or Poly/ML "Version 4 implements SML '97". Thus potential users get the impression of Standard ML as a historic footnote of no practical relevance today, despite lots of activity in some (very few) SML implementations.
Apart from updating the short descriptions (e.g. according to https://www.polyml.org or https://stackoverflow.com/tags/polyml/info), it would be also great to reorder the list roughly according to activity of continued development. In particular Mlton and Poly/ML would move further upwards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The important list of "Implementations ... of Standard ML" speaks in terms of "now" from approx. 10-15 years ago, e.g. for Moscow ML "Version 2.0, now implements SML '97" or Poly/ML "Version 4 implements SML '97". Thus potential users get the impression of Standard ML as a historic footnote of no practical relevance today, despite lots of activity in some (very few) SML implementations.
Apart from updating the short descriptions (e.g. according to https://www.polyml.org or https://stackoverflow.com/tags/polyml/info), it would be also great to reorder the list roughly according to activity of continued development. In particular Mlton and Poly/ML would move further upwards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: