Cardinality of translatable properties

[sandervd]

There are multiple instances in ADMS-APv2.0.1 where the cardinality of a property is defined as 1..n, but in reality, the intention is that of 1..1, with the note that the property can be translated.

I would suggest that we assume a different notation for expressing this cardinality.

This should be expressed in the shacl representation.
( sh:uniqueLang true )

Some examples:
Asset:

• dct:description
• dct:title

Asset repository:

• dct:description
• dct:title

Asset distribution:

• dct:description
• dct:title