Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IDO 9 #217

Closed
Mttbnchtt opened this issue Sep 4, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

IDO 9 #217

Mttbnchtt opened this issue Sep 4, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Mttbnchtt
Copy link
Collaborator

I do not fully understand #201 about IDO 9.

Anyway, concerning the disposition to benefit:

  1. definition: disposition to provide a good or profit.
  2. parent: disposition.

Notice that NCIT takes benefit to be a conceptual entity and not a disposition.

@Mttbnchtt Mttbnchtt self-assigned this Sep 4, 2019
@Mttbnchtt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

From #201:

increase benefits derived from natural resources
--> (?) the IDO phrasing references goods and services from ecosystems, but not necessarily natural ones - is natural intended?
--> all resources have some benefit dispositions

If so, use:

...increase benefits derived from ecosystems

@Mttbnchtt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

In the end, I think that "increase benefits derived from natural resources" is the best label for this class. Moreover, it seems to me that, as far as IDO 9 is concerned, we do not need other classes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant