Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IDO 1: Shock and vulnerable communities #202

Closed
Mttbnchtt opened this issue Aug 28, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

IDO 1: Shock and vulnerable communities #202

Mttbnchtt opened this issue Aug 28, 2019 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Mttbnchtt
Copy link
Collaborator

Mttbnchtt commented Aug 28, 2019

As @pbuttigieg mentions in issue #201, we need the class shock to describe IDO 1. For the Oxford English Dictionary, a shock is a state. We do not have the class state in SDGIO.

This is how some ontology (I forget which one) defines state: " The combination of circumstances or attributes belonging at a particular time to a person or thing; a particular manner or way of existing as defined by the presence of certain circumstances or attributes; a condition."

Do we add state to SDGIO? If yes, where?
State as condition may be a realizable entity. However, state as a combination of circumstances does not seems a realizable entity, although it does not fit obviously any other category. Suggestions?

Concerning shock, the OED is less useful. I suggested to put it under state with the following definition: a state of distress or disorientation brought about by sudden subjection to an acute or pervasive problem. Suggestions?

@marieALaporte

@Mttbnchtt Mttbnchtt self-assigned this Aug 28, 2019
@Mttbnchtt Mttbnchtt changed the title Shock IDO 1: Shock Sep 9, 2019
@Mttbnchtt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I added "state" as a realizable entity (with a new definition) and shock under state.

@Mttbnchtt Mttbnchtt reopened this Sep 11, 2019
@Mttbnchtt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

In #201, we say to compose certain processes at the instance level. What do we mean?

@Mttbnchtt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Two more questions:

  1. What objective corresponds to the process "improve resilience for vulnerable communities"? IDO 1 refers only to poors.
  2. Is there a way to say "has objective specification an INDIVIDUAL" (where I put the individual goal in the place of INDIVIDUAL)? Protege does not seem to let me do that.

@Mttbnchtt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

In #201, we say to compose certain processes at the instance level. What do we mean?

We wait for the CGIAR example.

@Mttbnchtt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Mttbnchtt commented Sep 11, 2019

  1. Is there a way to say "has objective specification an INDIVIDUAL" (where I put the individual goal in the place of INDIVIDUAL)? Protege does not seem to let me do that.

We do it at the instance level: individual has objective specification invidual. We use robot and yaml to do it after genering a tsv file.

@Mttbnchtt Mttbnchtt changed the title IDO 1: Shock IDO 1: Shock and vulnerable communities Sep 12, 2019
@Mttbnchtt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Mttbnchtt commented Sep 12, 2019

  1. What objective corresponds to the process "improve resilience for vulnerable communities"? IDO 1 refers only to poors.

Contrary to what stated in #201, IDO 1 does not involve "vulnerable community". IDO 4 and sub-IDO D1.4 involves "vulnerable community".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant