You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For tall and skinny matrices, say 100,000-by-1,000, instead of calling GEQP3 on the tall and skinny matrix, it might be better to call GEQRF on the tall and skinny, and then GEQP3 on the 1,000-by-1,000. We can have a branch in GEQP3 to do this. Based on a ratio for m/n. This would be akin to what we do for SVD. The main difficulty is compatibility of interface with GEPQ3. It would be easier for the GEQRF+GEQP3 algorithm to return Q and R, as opposed to Householder vectors and R.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
For tall and skinny matrices, say 100,000-by-1,000, instead of calling GEQP3 on the tall and skinny matrix, it might be better to call GEQRF on the tall and skinny, and then GEQP3 on the 1,000-by-1,000. We can have a branch in GEQP3 to do this. Based on a ratio for m/n. This would be akin to what we do for SVD. The main difficulty is compatibility of interface with GEPQ3. It would be easier for the GEQRF+GEQP3 algorithm to return Q and R, as opposed to
Householder vectors
and R.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions