Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Help text for Most Cited and Most Viewed tables #730

Open
nrshapiro opened this issue Mar 6, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Help text for Most Cited and Most Viewed tables #730

nrshapiro opened this issue Mar 6, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Feature (New) Enhancement - new feature or request OC Please Review

Comments

@nrshapiro
Copy link
Contributor

Per the meeting today DT would like to have help text on the Most Cited and Most Viewed tables (pages). Here's what it looks like now...it's not clear where the best place to put the help icon here. It applies to all columns.

image

Basically, what we discussed it should say in general is something like:

"citation counts are calculated based on the current stage of reference matching on PEP-Web. The counts may change as we adjust incorrect reference data in the database and based on the sensitivity of our heuristic matching and whether or not a reference is an exact match, including the source, to what's in PEP-Web."

Thinking about what to say, I'm not sure we need to say anything on the view count page. Basically, there changes would only occur if we find aberrant view data (or, if we were to change policy as to what counts as a view).

@davidtuckett @nadinelevinson @ocappello @jordanallen-dev @SophieMBennett

@nrshapiro nrshapiro added Feature (New) Enhancement - new feature or request OC Please Review labels Mar 6, 2023
@ocappello
Copy link
Contributor

apologies, but in the first instance, i've no idea how to even get to that page--with the left infocard set up in that way.

once i am there, i can share my personal view.

one observation is that the webpage is already drowning in words, so we ought to think of somewhere we can make that information available--POP-UP/link to support page, something like that. not more words there!

@nrshapiro
Copy link
Contributor Author

nrshapiro commented Mar 8, 2023

apologies, but in the first instance, i've no idea how to even get to that page--with the left infocard set up in that way.

once i am there, i can share my personal view.

one observation is that the webpage is already drowning in words, so we ought to think of somewhere we can make that information available--POP-UP/link to support page, something like that. not more words there!

@ocappello @jordanallen-dev @SophieMBennett

Yes, I agree that it's pretty much a hidden feature. I do note it's not in the help pages; I don't know if it's covered in a video. And the text for the ? should mention it. And really, it could be made an icon at the top of those infocards, with it's own tool tip.

Anyway, at the bottom of most viewed, and most cited infocards, there's a link that says: "View All". Click that for the two statistical summary pages.

@davidtuckett
Copy link

Looks like Help pages on this are needed.

  1. Enable Most cited/viewed in perferences.
  2. Will display on right.
  3. Scroll to bottom of info page and click view all.

Note in old pep web you could sort by your choice - now there is a filter dialogue but I am not sure what it does - it dies allow you to out in name and see that author's citations..

Perhaps all these prefs need Help pages - including explanation purpose.

@davidtuckett
Copy link

Regarding the text. I think (1) we need a Help page for advanced users which has definitions/explanations of our search ir counting methodologies. (2) We need a button or something wherever we present results labelled either Definitions of For Advanced Users or something and all od this nees to be clear ijn Help..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature (New) Enhancement - new feature or request OC Please Review
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants