Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No way to get to the Glossary in the "General" case #714

Open
nrshapiro opened this issue Feb 15, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

No way to get to the Glossary in the "General" case #714

nrshapiro opened this issue Feb 15, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Approved for Action This work has been approved Feature (New) Enhancement - new feature or request Priority Low Issue of low importance Quick (Very) <1 hr to fix

Comments

@nrshapiro
Copy link
Contributor

Per discussion in our meeting following https://github.com/Psychoanalytic-Electronic-Publishing/Support/issues/441 I think we concluded that it would be a good idea to have a link to the Glossary. The reason we removed it was due to concerns that it had a separate section in the book list, at the top, taking up valuable listing space. During the meeting I suggested a different solution.

We could place a link in the Glossary infocard that brings you to the "top" (TOC) of the Glossary. It could be in the label of the infocard, or possibly, it could just be placed in the text of the card when it looks like this (when there are no specific glossary terms showing...which is often, and when they are showing, you don't need to get to the top, typically).

So we could add "Click here to view the glossary table of contents."

Putting it as a link in the text would be exceptionally easy! It's just a document link to ZBK.069.0000A, i.e., https://pep-web.org/search/document/ZBK.069.0000A

image

@SophieMBennett @davidtuckett @jordanallen-dev @nadinelevinson

@nrshapiro nrshapiro added Feature (New) Enhancement - new feature or request Priority Low Issue of low importance Quick (Very) <1 hr to fix OC Please Review labels Feb 15, 2023
@davidtuckett
Copy link

Agrred. The only suggestion I add is that it should be ""Click here to view the selection of terms PEP has compiled in a consolidated glossary." If that makes sense.

@ocappello ocappello added Approved for Action This work has been approved and removed OC Please Review labels Feb 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Approved for Action This work has been approved Feature (New) Enhancement - new feature or request Priority Low Issue of low importance Quick (Very) <1 hr to fix
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants