Proposal for "up next" attribute in <liveItem> #496
Replies: 8 comments
-
I suggest looking to Twitch for suggestions on terminology as “upNext” makes me think it’s merely the next scheduled event (which could be some time away), not passing the audience to somewhere else. Maybe this should be rolled into some kind of “redirect” option, that would trigger an optional redirect when the live event ends (but should probably not force a redirect—though that could be an additional option). This could redirect to someone else’s live event, or to any other kind of after-event call-to-action. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
On twitch they call this behavior a "raid" where a streamer can dump their audience into another stream in progress. Meh, I don't like the "raid" term. The "raid" is a function that you can choose at a whim and the "upNext" I'm going for is more a scheduling use-case. For instance, on Monday nights Hog Story comes on at 7 central, then Behind The Sch3m3s comes on at 9:30. With an "up next" tag, Hog Story can use a set-it-and-forget-it reusable attribute to build the cross-community audience and reinforce the Monday night scheduling flow. Another use case I thought of was if there was a public radio station feed with all their shows in I really am hoping we start thinking about this tag in a much bigger sense of radio/television programming history; I think we can do much better creatively than "What Would Twitch Do" mind traps for the development of all this tag could achieve. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That's what it was! Yeah, I don't like that, either. I think "redirect" is general and descriptive. The tag inside a live block could look like this:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am not sure about the force being a namespace decision, that seems better to be left up to the apps as it's their decision whether to enforce anything that happens in the namespace. What would be a reason for me to ever use force='false' for instance? I do like the idea of a potentially new tag altogether like this, but also an attribute might be easier/quicker to implement. I'm sort of back-and-forth on that lol |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Actually on second thought, I am talking about something Live-specific that solves a programming/scheduling experience need. There is the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Putting Here are some reasons to force or not force:
As for how the apps handle it, I suggest they all respect the "force" option. But a non-forced redirect could have a visual "countdown" that will automatically redirect unless canceled/dismissed, or simply display the redirect without any automated action. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Interesting! I'll have to take some time and think about that, I like the examples |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Having had some time to think this over, I still am not convinced there's any need for a "forced" attribute because the use cases you give for using As for the separate tag issue, I don't want to ever redirect a listener from a recorded episode to some episode outside my feed. There is a good argument for sending people to related/friendly shows via the The only time I would want to redirect listeners to a different item is when it's a time-sensitive redirect at the end of my stream to another |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Bear with me as this is my first proposal, but I've been thinking:
It would be a wonderful feature if the
<liveItem>
had a way to pass in some sort of "up next" attribute that pointed to another<liveItem>
either in the same or in a separate feed. This would ask the apps to switch the user (perhaps automatically, or perhaps via a pop-up prompt) to this next<liveItem>
once the podcaster flips their current<liveItem>
status from "live" to "ended."Not sure the best way to write it, as you'd need an optional feed attribute (assume item is in the same feed if no feed attribute is present) plus a guid element. This could dovetail with the functionality Alecks has discussed with playlists in the namespace. Maybe have an
upNextFeed=""
and anupNextItem=""
with GUIDs in each spot?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions