Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EPIC: Collections #87

Open
blake-regalia opened this issue Nov 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

EPIC: Collections #87

blake-regalia opened this issue Nov 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@blake-regalia
Copy link
Contributor

blake-regalia commented Nov 7, 2022

To allow for the query of the union of multiple graphs at specific versions
A collection can reference other repos' branch or lock, and the collection query would query against the union of those graphs

@blake-regalia blake-regalia modified the milestone: New Nov 7, 2022
@blake-regalia blake-regalia changed the title Collections EPIC: Collections Nov 7, 2022
@stevevestal
Copy link

Most workflows we see use multiple documents/ontologies. A collection of multiple repos with one document/ontology, or a repo with multiple documents/ontologies, either could group related ones. Either way, serialized or transactional commits on collections of documents/ontologies would be useful for configuration management, but locks on commits of single models could be sufficient. Workflows in big projects use documents/ontologies from multiple servers owned by multiple organizations, so there is still global configuration management to be done. The best thing I know of to help manage configurations globally is for developers to use the standards for namespace/ontology IRIs and version IRIs together with locks on commits. RDF graphs are not required to contain those, but most documents/ontologies have them. Something else that might be useful is to tag (in the git sense) a commit that is locked by the owning organization (read-only access to others) as a deliverable version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: New
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants