You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To allow for the query of the union of multiple graphs at specific versions
A collection can reference other repos' branch or lock, and the collection query would query against the union of those graphs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Most workflows we see use multiple documents/ontologies. A collection of multiple repos with one document/ontology, or a repo with multiple documents/ontologies, either could group related ones. Either way, serialized or transactional commits on collections of documents/ontologies would be useful for configuration management, but locks on commits of single models could be sufficient. Workflows in big projects use documents/ontologies from multiple servers owned by multiple organizations, so there is still global configuration management to be done. The best thing I know of to help manage configurations globally is for developers to use the standards for namespace/ontology IRIs and version IRIs together with locks on commits. RDF graphs are not required to contain those, but most documents/ontologies have them. Something else that might be useful is to tag (in the git sense) a commit that is locked by the owning organization (read-only access to others) as a deliverable version.
To allow for the query of the union of multiple graphs at specific versions
A collection can reference other repos' branch or lock, and the collection query would query against the union of those graphs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: