-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Address species that have too long filenames because of accidentally using the long gene name form #21
Comments
This particular file is still problematic. The actual file contents is tiny, so you can see the source accession and gbif record ids for help in fixing the problem:
|
Though this won't affect production since the result is this file is not aligned, so the species is ignored:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
When attempting to generate a tarball of all the data, this caused a problem:
/usr/local/ruby/2.5.5/lib/ruby/2.5.0/rubygems/package/tar_writer.rb:330:in `split_name': File "phylogatr-results/Bacillariophyceae/Bacillariales/Bacillariaceae/Pseudo-nitzschia-mannii/Pseudo-nitzschia-mannii-RIBULOSE-1,5-BISPHOSPHATE-CARBOXYLASE-OXYGENASE-LARGE-SUBUNIT-(RBCL)-GENE.afa" has a too long name (should be 100 or less) (Gem::Package::TooLongFileName)
The problem is
Pseudo-nitzschia-mannii-RIBULOSE-1,5-BISPHOSPHATE-CARBOXYLASE-OXYGENASE-LARGE-SUBUNIT-(RBCL)-GENE.afa
where this is obviously not the short form of the gene name:RIBULOSE-1,5-BISPHOSPHATE-CARBOXYLASE-OXYGENASE-LARGE-SUBUNIT-(RBCL)-GENE
. That short form is probably RBCL.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: