-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reenable local-uri support when deprecating RelativeSource #148
Comments
hi, actually i found that up to commit b2a4a8f there was a pack-uri and local-uri scheme handler. |
Hello @simonbuehler , sorry for the late answer. I am trying to remember why I remove the local uri scheme. I guess that I could reintroduce-it using the same hack as pack url. Maybe the new API will accept an absolute path and let the application figure out how to build it. That said, in any case, I will drop relative source support without addressing this point, Could you explain better your use case? And why embedded resources are not a good solution for you? |
The use case is a application that runs in a kiosk mode and the customers should be able to replace dynamic content like their logos / images in sliders / css styles by replacing files in a folder on the desktop. |
could you still find some time for this isse, would be awesome! |
hi @simonbuehler , with the current solution do you have any limitation for the scenario you are targeting? |
sorry for the delay - the limit is that i can't use filesystem content as the relative source doesn't set the mime type and the last implemention of LocalUriResourceHandler did. It would be perfect if one could chosoe from useing pack:// ( internal) resoures or local:// ( filesystem) resources with those customized CfxResponse headers and MimeTypes |
hi,
in my usecase the app should allow to easily replace assets ( pngs / html text/ ...) by the end user and therefore the html/asset files should not be hidden inside the Application.
When RelativeSource will be removed there is no easy way to provide this possibility to the users or did i miss something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: