typo: practioners? #599
Assignees
Comments
kevin-hoke
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 20, 2024
* Initial commit * draft * refresh- * rev1 * rev2 * rev3 * rev4 * rev5 * rev6 * rev7 * r8 * r9 * r9 * r10 * r11 * rev-5-15 * r05-21 * rv2-05-21 * rv3-5-21 * rv4-5-21 * rv5-5-21 * rv6-5-21 * rv7-5-21 * rv8-5-21 * rv8-5-21 * rv10-5-21 * r11 * r12-5-21 * r13 * r1-5-22 * r2 * r3 * r6 * r7 * r1-5-23 * r3-5-23 * r1-5-24 * r2 * r3 * r4 * r6 * r6-5-24 * r7 * r8 * r9 * r10 * r1-5-28 * r2-5-28 * r3-5-28 * r4-5-28 * r1-5-30 * r2-5-30 * r3 * r4 * r5 * r1-5-31 * r2 * r3 * r1-6-3 * r2-6-3 * r3-6-3 * r1-6-4 * r1-6-5 * r2-6-5 * r3-6-5 * r4-6-5 * r1-6-6 * r2-6-6 * r3-6-6 * r4-6-6- * r5-6-6 * Add NeMo solution documentation * Minor wording changes * Add notes re compatibility --------- Co-authored-by: Oglesby, Michael <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kevin Hoke <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Page URL
https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/netapp-solutions/containers/dwn_overview_devops.html
Page title
DevOps Overview
Summary
If practioners is a word, I can't find it in any dictionary. I think this is meant to be practitioners.
Public issues must not contain sensitive information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: