Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
I'm curious how did you get this table and where did the output come from? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
@dhcho347 I apologize that I overlooked this discussion earlier. There have been some important bugfixes to SR made, but I'm not sure whether this resolves the issue you describe above. Would you mind to post a minimal script that reproduces the issue we can use to create an issue and investigate? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi, I think I bring back the 2 yaw angles in SR optimization.
with default input parameter
in the second pass, we lost 2 angles due to the clip
The length of the first and last subdivision has changed (from 6.25 to 3.125)
This makes the center does not match to the first pass no longer.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NNB-2VbZFfed8HEw6xYvsuvMsQ1bM-K3LYQDsSkoFlA/edit#gid=1989138220
So, we can't get the 23.4375 degree result from ex10.
(The others (21.875, 22.65625, 24.21875, 25) are there)
We need to change the values in first and last subdivision.
for example, last subdivision,
We have to take 23.4375 instead of 25
#Enhancement
As one of the temporary solutions,
I've add 5 lines in the method _generate_evaluation_grid(self, pass_depth, turbine_depth):
dhcho347@234f883
#Results
After change, I got a 23.4375 degree result from ex10.
Before, yaw_angles_subset in last division was : [21.875, 22.6563, (x 23.4375), 24.2188, 25]
after, yaw_angles_subset in last division was : [21.875, 22.6563, 23.4375, 24.2188, (x 25 in first pass)]
Please, check this one
Thank you
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions