Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature]: Dealing with faulty (non-circular) averaging in SCADA #90

Open
Bartdoekemeijer opened this issue Jun 16, 2023 · 4 comments
Open
Labels
ideas-list Ideas that would be nice to do but aren't scheduled. Lower priority than back-log. new-feature A new feature

Comments

@Bartdoekemeijer
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

FLASC currently assumes that the wind direction is the underlying SCADA has been correctly time-averaged, i.e., dealing with 360 deg wrapping for angular variables like wind direction and nacelle heading. However, this is often not the case when working with 10-minute averaged data from an operational asset. It would be great if FLASC could find these obvious outliers and mark them as faulty.

Related URLs

No response

@paulf81
Copy link
Collaborator

paulf81 commented Jun 16, 2023

That's a nice idea, just wanted to jot down some ideas while fresh:

  • Flag changes in direction above some threshold (90 deg?)
  • Threshold based approach: toggling between <20 | > 340 and >160 & < 200
  • some sort of expectation comparison, like predict the value of a point as being the midpoint of the point before and after it, and a point that is off by more than 100 deg is flagged

@Bartdoekemeijer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yeah good ideas! Maybe the expectation comparison can leverage the neighbouring turbines? E.g., if the median change in wind direction of all turbines is 10 deg, but there are one or two turbines reporting 150 degrees, then those are probably outliers.

@paulf81
Copy link
Collaborator

paulf81 commented Jun 20, 2023

That also makes sense to me, could be a threshold like, can't exceed some X times the median change?

@paulf81 paulf81 added ideas-list Ideas that would be nice to do but aren't scheduled. Lower priority than back-log. new-feature A new feature labels Dec 12, 2023
@aclerc
Copy link
Contributor

aclerc commented Aug 5, 2024

This is a feature in wind-up. Happy to discuss further if it's of interest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ideas-list Ideas that would be nice to do but aren't scheduled. Lower priority than back-log. new-feature A new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants