Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Verbiage revisit later #234

Closed
koay9f opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Verbiage revisit later #234

koay9f opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
clarification requirements related to the issue need refinements/clarifications help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@koay9f
Copy link
Collaborator

koay9f commented Sep 13, 2024

Documentation team to revisit later:

Welcome message: revisit this intro sentence to capture how identifying NEBs should bring attention to the broader impacts of energy efficiency opportunities
KPI naming convention, for example, Reduce Expense Cost
update KPI description text
revisit Industrial system inventory field names, review the field names that will change based on the Industrial System selected above
NEB card: Revisit the terminology “Performance Metric” and “Impacts”
NEBs tab: revisit this page when implementing a section for the NEBs that can’t be tied to a particular Energy Eff Opp,
NEB tab: Revisit this page when additionally implementing a section for NEBs that all in the same category and are best represented as a cumulative/aggregate calculation
Report: Savings need consistency throughout? Revisit the words around savings/cost/benefits/impact

@koay9f koay9f added clarification requirements related to the issue need refinements/clarifications help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Sep 13, 2024
@rmroot
Copy link
Collaborator

rmroot commented Oct 7, 2024

Verbiage Check Notes 2:

  • Intro statement on landing screen "Use this tool to identify, estimate potential and report on non-energy benefits.."
  • Desired Impact -> Expected Impact (direction?)
  • KPI descriptions -> Sarah will be developing descriptions, but for now it's generic Latin placeholder (Kpi Descriptions #263)
  • Maintenance expense -> needs to be a higher-level category -> requires further discussion on this type of concern. (Move Maintenance Expense to KPI level #264)
  • Industrial system inventory -> not all items are applicable, but it's OK for now. Will need to expand table. Note during the demo that this is in draft and move through quickly. Also need to revisit units for matching to the proper component. (Energy Equipment Fields #163)
  • Performance Metric Impact -> "Key Performance …" (don't leave off "Key" anywhere)
  • Assessment Non-Energy Benefits -> Help text example that highlights what 'specific' means.
  • KPI Selection -> move this down into Facilities; tease apart Facility KPI from Corporate KPIs and connect the two. (Move KPI/KPMs to Facility Level #265)
  • Results -> Additional Operational Benefits-> requires further discussion (Report calc bugs #239 ?)

Updated bullets with new issues

@rmroot rmroot self-assigned this Oct 8, 2024
@koay9f
Copy link
Collaborator Author

koay9f commented Oct 16, 2024

Missed a "Performance Metric" (related to button)
Fill out the impacts on company performance metrics () that can be associated with this Non-energy Benefit. Click the "Search Performance Metrics" button and a modal will appear to find and add performance metrics that are typically associated with this NEB.

rmroot added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2024
@koay9f koay9f closed this as completed Oct 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clarification requirements related to the issue need refinements/clarifications help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants