From 232c7c4293e8dd8aad49532adc743f16a7f5828f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Neal Kruis Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 09:05:22 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Further clarification to PLF(PLR) changes. --- src/Transition/InputRulesFiles/Rules23-1-0-to-23-2-0.md | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/Transition/InputRulesFiles/Rules23-1-0-to-23-2-0.md b/src/Transition/InputRulesFiles/Rules23-1-0-to-23-2-0.md index 58f3045ce45..f96b0848e22 100644 --- a/src/Transition/InputRulesFiles/Rules23-1-0-to-23-2-0.md +++ b/src/Transition/InputRulesFiles/Rules23-1-0-to-23-2-0.md @@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ This was previously an Excel workbook that made for very difficult version contr # Part Load Fraction Correlations -This changes brings greater consistency in how part load performance is characterized across coils. These coils now use a traditional +This change brings greater consistency in how part load performance is characterized across coils, and applies to any coil object where a new +"Part Load Fraction Correlation Curve" input is added per the "Object Changes" below. These coils now use a traditional curve fit to characterize part load fraction as a function of part load ratio. The previous approach was more theoretical based on inputs shared with the latent degradation model. An approximate conversion from the previous inputs to a linear part load fraction curve is described below: