You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The host name below should be that of the recording host,
not the Master Backend. Sending to the MBE will not remove
the file on the Slave. Related to #198.
The current state of the app does not expect that you will be connecting to separately to master and secondary backends. My understanding of the services api is that the master backend will broker calls to secondary backends when appropriate.
If this is not the case, then we need to re-think our preferences for setting up a location. One thing I now see needing is for a location is a map of secondary backends as well well as frontends. I think we will also need to rework how the auto-discovery works as well. We could probably use what is broadcast on the network to determine these, but this will only be applicable for home locations. For away locations where you are ssh tunneling into your network, I don't think we will be able to make secondary backend calls without opening multiple ssh tunnels.
Right, it's a design change. And given that Android doesn't allow users
to build an /etc/hosts file, the recording hostname is only partially valuable.
I know I can fix the detection part (where the host/slave status is detected.)
This truly did fail as written. I had to use a browser to delete the recording
with RemoveRecorded and use the SBE's address. But there are some users
who don't like/use avahi and prefer to enter IPs manually.
The host name below should be that of the recording host,
not the Master Backend. Sending to the MBE will not remove
the file on the Slave. Related to #198.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: