You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In order to be confident that the new column additions to stop_times.txt with Flex are not having a significant impact on the validator's performance, we want to compare the average runtime for the validation between 5.0 and 6.0.
Proposed solution
Include analytics about how long run time was in 5.0 vs. 6.0 for each feed.
Alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Restored the beach feat/1698 base branch of feat: add performance assessment to acceptance tests #1771. In this PR, the time validationTimeSeconds was introduced to the JSON report. There were no significant changes from 5.0.1 to this branch.
Created a PR with a branch based from feat/1698 to gather all JSON reports that include the new field validationTimeSeconds. This PR had to be against a similar branch due to a limitation in GitHub that blocks automation from running when conflicts are present more info.
Created a Python script locally to compare metrics of the latest master acceptance tests with the one extracted from feat/1698(close to 5.0.1). The script also looks for the most significant changes in time consumption across all feeds.
The Java memory max heap was increased to 12GB to avoid impacting the metrics due to crashing validators.
Describe the problem
In order to be confident that the new column additions to stop_times.txt with Flex are not having a significant impact on the validator's performance, we want to compare the average runtime for the validation between 5.0 and 6.0.
Proposed solution
Include analytics about how long run time was in 5.0 vs. 6.0 for each feed.
Alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: