diff --git a/docs/documentation/expectedPerformance.md b/docs/documentation/expectedPerformance.md index 1750d8e53..bfbffcc68 100644 --- a/docs/documentation/expectedPerformance.md +++ b/docs/documentation/expectedPerformance.md @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ # Performance Results -MFC has been extensively benchmarked on CPUs and GPU devices. -A summary of these results follows. +MFC has been benchmarked on several CPUs and GPU devices. +This page shows a summary of these results. ## Expected time-steps/hour -The following table outlines expected performance in terms of the number of time steps per hour (rounded to the nearest hundred, higher is better). -A 3D inviscid, 6-equation (`'model_eqns' : 3`) problem is solved for various problem sizes (grid cells) and hardware. +The following table outlines expected performance in terms of the number of time steps per hour, rounded to the nearest hundred (higher is better). +A 3D inviscid, 6-equation problem is solved for various problem sizes (grid cells) and hardware. CPU results utilize an entire processor die. | Hardware | # Cores | Steps/Hr (1M pts) | Steps/Hr (4M pts) | Steps/Hr (8M pts) | Compiler | Computer | @@ -18,9 +18,8 @@ CPU results utilize an entire processor die. | Intel Xeon Gold 6226 | 12 (cores) | 2.5k | 0.7k | 0.4k | GNU 10.3.0 | PACE Phoenix | | Apple Silicon M2 | 6 (cores) | 2.8k | 0.6k | 0.2k | GNU 13.2.0 | N/A | -If `'model_eqns' : 3` is replaced by `'model_eqns' : 2`, an inviscid 5-equation model is used. -The below table shows expected performance via the number of time steps per hour (rounded to the nearest hundred) for various problem sizes and hardware for an inviscid, 5-equation, 3D simulation. -CPU results use an entire processor die. +We also show the expected performance of MFC for a 3D inviscid 5-equation problem in the table below. +It is presented in the same manner as the one above. | Hardware | # Cores | Steps/Hr (1M pts) | Steps/Hr (4M pts) | Steps/Hr (8M pts) | Compiler | Computer | | ---: | :----: | :----: | :---: | :---: | :----: | :--- |