We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Actual situation:
Example (Blank AC2.10 DWG file) BLANK.DWG.gz After conversion to JSON, there is BLOCK_HEADER in the form:
... { } ...
Because code (in src/out_json.c):
... case DWG_TYPE_BLOCK_HEADER: if (dat->version <= R_12 && strEQc (obj->tio.object->tio.BLOCK_HEADER->name, "*MODEL_SPACE")) { LOG_TRACE ("Skip *MODEL_SPACE\n"); return 0; } ...
Which generates an ERROR log in conversion from JSON to DWG:
ERROR: Required (null).type missing, skipped
Because JSON {}.
{}
I think that is bad. Some possibilities:
{ "object": "BLOCK_HEADER", "index": 5, "type": 49, "handle": [0, 1, 31], "size": 0, "flag": 0, "name": "*MODEL_SPACE", "block_offset_r11": 4294967295, "unknown_r11": 0 },
Which seems somehow right. The result after conversion from JSON to DWG is fine.
@Ruban What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I forgot why I skipped it there. It can be skipped in encode easier. Variant 2 please
Sorry, something went wrong.
I forgot why I skipped it there.
I think that was some issue here some time ago.
It can be skipped in encode easier. Variant 2 please
Ok, actually is fine I believe.
PR: #834
I need to look. There were more changes in e5f27c1
No branches or pull requests
Actual situation:
Example (Blank AC2.10 DWG file)
BLANK.DWG.gz
After conversion to JSON, there is BLOCK_HEADER in the form:
Because code (in src/out_json.c):
Which generates an ERROR log in conversion from JSON to DWG:
Because JSON
{}
.I think that is bad.
Some possibilities:
Which seems somehow right.
The result after conversion from JSON to DWG is fine.
@Ruban What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: