Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Status-line & tooltips #561

Closed
musikBear opened this issue Apr 4, 2014 · 10 comments
Closed

Status-line & tooltips #561

musikBear opened this issue Apr 4, 2014 · 10 comments

Comments

@musikBear
Copy link

Current the behavior on mouseOver of a note-container in song-editor, is to show a tool-tip repeat: "doubleclick to open this pattern...". This is ofcause usefull for the inexperienced user, but after a while most will properly disabel tooltips. Question is now: Could the tool-tip be used for more general usefull features, or should LMMS have a status-bar? What i miss is some way to see the whole user-name of a block. If the container is short, the user will only see a couple of letters. The container-name is obscured. The user need to open pianoroll, and then the name is nicely written in the win-bar. Could the win-bar be used as a status-line (done that often in my proggies) or could tool-tips have a dual usage (second-layer so to speak.. hmm?? -
in pseudo - if (tooltip-off then ... tooltip==focusContain.name ..??) Otherwise -A status-line with user-information like user-named-blocks, would be a neat feature.

@diizy
Copy link
Contributor

diizy commented Apr 4, 2014

What's a win-bar?

@musikBear
Copy link
Author

Q

What's a win-bar?

q
:p you know the blue 'egde' in top of a windows window -now it says lmms 1.0'.
In some languaes its called 'caption-bar' .. surely linux has something 'like' it -but a different aproach could be a status-bar like the one in GIMP, (info-text in lowest left part of the screen)
A behavior with mouseOver+ctrl, would also work well - in fact better, because then the item in focus should only be stringed-out on a user-active- event. ==Better design

@diizy
Copy link
Contributor

diizy commented Apr 4, 2014

On 04/04/2014 07:36 PM, musikBear wrote:

Q
What's a win-bar?
q
:p you know the blue 'egde' in top of a windows window -now it says
lmms 1.0'.
In some languaes its called 'caption-bar' .. surely linux has
something 'like' it -but a different aproach could be a status-bar
like the one in GIMP, (info-text in lowest left part of the screen)
A behavior with mouseOver+ctrl, would also work well - in fact better,
because then the item in focus should only be stringed-out on a
user-active- event. ==Better design

An extra static bar in the UI seems kind of problematic - we already
need all the screenspace we can get, adding in stuff would seem
counterproductive.

@diizy
Copy link
Contributor

diizy commented Apr 4, 2014

We could however use the menubar that now has the "file, edit, tools"
etc. as there's plenty of space on the right that could be utilized.
Only question is whether doing this is possible in Qt (I'm not sure,
will look into it).

@musikBear
Copy link
Author

sounds good! 👍

@Umcaruje Umcaruje changed the title Enhancement: Status-line & tooltips Status-line & tooltips Jun 29, 2015
@Umcaruje Umcaruje added the gui label Jun 29, 2015
@musikBear
Copy link
Author

error

@zonkmachine
Copy link
Member

error

?

@musikBear
Copy link
Author

@zonkmachine i made a posting error 🙈 The topic is still valid, and also not closed, so all is well 👼
Except diiz ofcause not 'looking'. Imo a simple tooltip change from name of instrument, as it is now, to showing the block-name, would be satisfactory, eg the same method that is used in mixer to show channel-names horizontally, could be reused to show block-name. After all, the name of the instrument can be seen a few inches to the left already, so a tooltip with instrument-name is redundant.
Perhaps in 1.2.1 :)

@firewall1110
Copy link
Contributor

Isn't this done?

@musikBear
Copy link
Author

Yes! This works fine in 1.3:

Image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants