We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently we don't include the SPF standard method when we use pywincalc's calc_optical method.
This is because most products we handle don't have measured data < 300nm, while SPF requires > 280 nm.
Consider writing some logic to check for the incoming measured wavelengths and, if 280nm and greater exist, include SPF in the standard methods.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
danielmcquillen
RDmitchell
StephenCzarnecki
No branches or pull requests
Currently we don't include the SPF standard method when we use pywincalc's calc_optical method.
This is because most products we handle don't have measured data < 300nm, while SPF requires > 280 nm.
Consider writing some logic to check for the incoming measured wavelengths and, if 280nm and greater exist, include SPF in the standard methods.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: