You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Marvin: <@!241898677390671872>You can ask your question here.
Space [2386328]: Hey, sorry I opened couple tickets by accident.
Space [2386328]: This is a great tool, but I think it doesn't work properly due to miscalculation. I wanted to ask if the employee efficiency formula in it has been updated? If not, will you guys update it? Thank you.
Space [2386328]: <@!117813482446913538> Hey there. Am I doing something wrong with the ticket here?
Isca [672082]: Nope. I cannot help with your question. Sorry, hopefully one of the other <@&679669933680230430> can.
Space [2386328]: who is?
cynikal [2130575]: I think this would need to be looked at by <@&753300236918718545> as it involves a back end change.
Decap [47662]: What exactly do we think is the miscalculation here? Happy to take a look
Space [2386328]: despite switching to the suggested set up, I still get a new suggestion. It's like a loop. I'm not sure if below formula is used or an older one.$efficiency = FLOOR(MIN(45, (45 / $required) * $stat) + MAX(0, (5 * LOG($stat / $required, 2))))
Kivou [2000607]: That's the one used
Kivou [2000607]: Can you point me to a bad computation of the efficiency so that I can have a look?
Space [2386328]: Well what I'm mainly saying is this for some reason I don't know, this suggested setup doesn't work.
Space [2386328]: Setting employees like YATA suggests, doesn't reach the working stats effectiveness that YATA tells it would.
Kivou [2000607]: I'm sorry but I don't understand what doesn't work
Space [2386328]: In the bottom of the first picture, it says "With the current repartition you reach a total working stats effectiveness of 1,786 (94%). "Once you click the orange figures, it shows the second image. Saying, "Keeping the same number of positions, the following repartition would yield 1893 working stats effectiveness:... " But when you switch to the suggested setup (image #2) it doesn't reach that efficiency.
Kivou [2000607]: Like not at all or is it off by 1 or 2?
Kivou [2000607]: There can be some rounding errors
Kivou [2000607]: And when you say "when you switch" is it in game or in yata?
Space [2386328]: In game.
Space [2386328]: When I switch to suggested setup (I switched it 7 times now, all suggested by YATA.) it reaches around 1790. Not +1890.
Kivou [2000607]: Can you check which one is wrong ?
Space [2386328]: For example it says "Violience [430277] as Sales Executive for 131 working stats (+10) " but that employee is already in that position. So that (+10) refers to what?
Space [2386328]: This is the employee
Space [2386328]: I don't know the calculation behind that, so I'm unable to point the error. But I can provide all the information you need to figure it out.
Kivou [2000607]: Based on your first screenshot Violience as sale executive has a WS effectiveness of 121 according to YATA
Kivou [2000607]: Based on your last screenshot Violience as sale executive has a WS effectiveness of 121 according to the game
Kivou [2000607]: I don't see where you see the "Violience [430277] as Sales Executive for 131 working stats (+10) "
Kivou [2000607]: in your second screenshot I see Violience as programmer for 127 (+6)
Space [2386328]: https://i.gyazo.com/b6ad4b872d40ca021753cf20250659c0.gif
Kivou [2000607]: ho right
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: