You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all, thank you for the awesome component.
While I was playing around with it, I realized that this is not responsive on smaller devices. I found this issue #4 and its still under "help wanted".
I tried some hacks:
use css transform to scale the container (example: transform: scale(0.75); transform-origin: top left;) but the overal layout did not look good. There is a gap below the icons due to the scale css
make the container scrollable but there is another issue here because now users can only see the first few negative feedback icons and they think they can only select from "Very Poor", "Poor" or "Average".
So if we can have the responsive icons, that is perfect.
If not, how about the ability to reverse the icons?
Thanks,
Louis
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, I can try to help you.
Can you share an example of your use case?
In the project I was using it, with the height/width props it worked on smaller devices for me.
I know it's a bit of a hack, but it can work.
My use case is simple, try to make it responsive in different screen sizes.
I did not end up with implementing anything. Coz most of our users are using desktop, so dont think its worth the effort for us to fix little thing.
But Im still intertested in you solution to see how you solve the problem.
Hello,
First of all, thank you for the awesome component.
While I was playing around with it, I realized that this is not responsive on smaller devices. I found this issue #4 and its still under "help wanted".
I tried some hacks:
transform: scale(0.75); transform-origin: top left;
) but the overal layout did not look good. There is a gap below the icons due to the scale cssSo if we can have the responsive icons, that is perfect.
If not, how about the ability to reverse the icons?
Thanks,
Louis
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: